The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau said this week it still intends to repeal most of the Obama-era strict rule governing payday loans, although the date appears to have slipped.
Monday’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling upending the leadership structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau did little to quell the arguments over the controversial agency and its work.
For credit union trade group and critics of the agency, the ruling did not go far enough since it did not rule the single-director structure unconstitutional. They said they hope the decision will increase the chance that Congress will enact legislation converting the agency into a commission.
Under a new pilot program announced last week, credit unions and other financial institutions are now able to request an advisory opinion from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau if they are uncertain about the application of bureau rules.
The agency will make certain requests and answers public in an effort to make its interpretation of rules clearer for the public.
The chairman of the controversial Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Task Force on Consumer Financial Law this week defended the panel from charges that its membership is loaded with advocates of deregulation and pledged to hold an open hearing this summer.
CFPB Director Kathy Kraninger defended her agency’s payday loan rulemaking process on Monday, disputing claims that political appointees at the bureau have played an inappropriate role in deciding whether the strict rule should be repealed.
Credit union trade groups said Monday that the long-awaited CFPB final rule governing remittances does not go far enough in exempting financial institutions that make a relatively small number of transactions each year.